Leaderboard
Most cost-effective models
Ratings come from pairwise human votes via Bradley-Terry (Elo-style for v0), shown with a ±confidence interval — the honesty check: a model with five votes never reads as equal to one with five hundred. Rows rank by Rating; the efficiency story lives in the green Rating / ¢ column — rating earned per cent of generation cost — and the ⚡ BEST /¢ chip marks its winner. Testers screen every build — the Playable column is the share of votes that say a build actually runs and plays; ✗-heavy models sink.
| # | Model | Playable | Rating / ¢ |
|---|---|---|---|
| ★ 1 | Qwen3 8B8B params | 25%· 1/5 ✓ | 6098 |
| 2 | Gemma 3 4B4B params | 0%· 0/5 | ⚡ BEST /¢22727 |
| 3 | Ministral 8B8B params | 0%· 0/5 | 13889 |
This board sharpens one screened build at a time. Play an unvetted build, call it playable or not — your vote lands here.
Screen a build →